<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizenship: the power and tools to influence policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenshipfoundation.org.uk/blogs/main/2009/11/25/citizenship-the-power-and-tools-to-influence-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenshipfoundation.org.uk/blogs/main/2009/11/25/citizenship-the-power-and-tools-to-influence-policy/</link>
	<description>General musings from Citizenship Foundation staff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ADRIAN</title>
		<link>http://citizenshipfoundation.org.uk/blogs/main/2009/11/25/citizenship-the-power-and-tools-to-influence-policy/#comment-3463</link>
		<dc:creator>ADRIAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenshipfoundation.org.uk/blogs/main/?p=92#comment-3463</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that citizens of Switzerland have a much greater power to influence both local and national policy than we have in the UK; the right to petition for a veto referendum means that politicians find it much more difficult to impose laws that are opposed by the majority:  if they try, they risk the possibility that an individual will successfully petition for a referendum on the law at issue.  The government is bound by the result of the referendum.  I shall not take seriously our politicians talk of democratic reform whilst they so studiously avoid Swiss style direct democracy. Parliamentary democracy, especially in the form of whipped parties, is a very inadequate form of democracy as more and more voters are coming to realise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that citizens of Switzerland have a much greater power to influence both local and national policy than we have in the UK; the right to petition for a veto referendum means that politicians find it much more difficult to impose laws that are opposed by the majority:  if they try, they risk the possibility that an individual will successfully petition for a referendum on the law at issue.  The government is bound by the result of the referendum.  I shall not take seriously our politicians talk of democratic reform whilst they so studiously avoid Swiss style direct democracy. Parliamentary democracy, especially in the form of whipped parties, is a very inadequate form of democracy as more and more voters are coming to realise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

